zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. davegu+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-22 18:57:44
Hi dang,

Seeing a bug in your comment here:

>>38382563

You reference the pages like this:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38375239?p=2

The second ? should be an & like this:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38375239&p=2

Please feel free to delete this message after you've received it.

replies(3): >>pauldd+a4 >>saliag+j5 >>pvg+86
2. pauldd+a4[view] [source] 2023-11-22 19:18:17
>>davegu+(OP)
Also, while we're at it:

"Nobody will be happier than I when this bottleneck (edit: the one in our code—not the world) is a thing of the past" [1]

HN plans to be multi-core?!?! A bigger scoop than OpenAI governance!

Anything more you can share?

[1] >>38351005

3. saliag+j5[view] [source] 2023-11-22 19:24:05
>>davegu+(OP)
Why do you (dang) always write a comment specifying that people can read more and even providing some links when it's clear that when you reach the bottom of the page you have to click "read more" to indeed read more. Isn't it a bit useless?
replies(2): >>bartre+Z5 >>pvg+c8
◧◩
4. bartre+Z5[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-22 19:26:49
>>saliag+j5
Because people don't, that's why.
5. pvg+86[view] [source] 2023-11-22 19:27:29
>>davegu+(OP)
If you want to reach the mods just email hn@ycombinator.com
replies(1): >>davegu+Rd
◧◩
6. pvg+c8[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-22 19:38:47
>>saliag+j5
when it's clear

It isn't that clear. People missing ui elements they have to scroll to is one of the most common ways of missing ui elements.

◧◩
7. davegu+Rd[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-22 20:03:52
>>pvg+86
Thank you for the advice. I will do that in the future.
[go to top]