zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. lxgr+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-22 13:36:47
Approval rates of >90% are quite common within political parties, to the point where anything less can be seen as an embarrassment to the incumbent head of party.
replies(1): >>kcplat+p2
2. kcplat+p2[view] [source] 2023-11-22 13:49:24
>>lxgr+(OP)
There is a big difference between “I agree with this…” when a telephone poll caller reaches you and “I am willing to leave my livelihood because my company CEO got fired”
replies(3): >>from-n+n6 >>lxgr+B6 >>zerbin+yc
◧◩
3. from-n+n6[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-22 14:08:01
>>kcplat+p2
But if 100 employees were like "I'm gonna leave" then your livelihood is in jeopardy. So you join in. It's really easy to see 90% of people jumping overboard when they are all on a sinking ship.
◧◩
4. lxgr+B6[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-22 14:08:44
>>kcplat+p2
I don't mean voter approval, I mean party member approval. That's arguably not that far off from a CEO situation in a way in that it's the opinion of and support for the group's leadership by group members.

Voter approval is actually usually much less unanimous, as far as I can tell.

◧◩
5. zerbin+yc[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-22 14:32:51
>>kcplat+p2
But it’s not changing their livelihood. Msft just gives them the same deal. In a lot of ways, it’s similar to the telepoll - people can just say whatever they want, there won’t be big material consequences
[go to top]