zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. ethanb+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-22 12:00:16
Good lord: it’s a private company. As a general matter of course it’s inadvisable to comment on specifics of why someone is fired. The lack of a thing that pretty much never happens anyway (public comment) is just harmful to your soap opera, not to the potential legitimacy of the action.
replies(2): >>mijoha+W1 >>danger+W4
2. mijoha+W1[view] [source] 2023-11-22 12:14:57
>>ethanb+(OP)
According to reports they haven't told executives and employees inside the company. (I'm not arguing that they should speak publicly, though given the position the board put itself in I think hiring PR people for external crisis comms is very much warranted)

When 95% of your staff threatens to resign and says "you have made a mistake", that's when it's time to say "no, the very good reasons we did it are this". That didn't happen.

3. danger+W4[view] [source] 2023-11-22 12:36:35
>>ethanb+(OP)
Its not a private company it is a non profit working in the public interest this usually requires some sort of public accountability. The board want to be a public good when they make decisions but want to be a private entity when those decisions are criticised by the public.
[go to top]