zlacker

> without ever deviating into under age material

So is this a "there should never be a Vladimir Nabokov in the form of AI allowed to exist"? When people get into saying AI's shouldn't be allowed to produce "X" you're also saying "AI's shouldn't be allowed to have creative vision to engage in sensitive subjects without sounding condescending". "The future should only be filled with very bland and non-offensive characters in fiction."

>>mlindn+(OP)
> The future should only be filled with very bland and non-offensive characters in fiction.

Did someone took the pen from the writers? Go ahead and write whatever you want.

It was an example of a constraint a company might want to enforce in their AI.

>>krisof+uA
If the future we're talking about is a future where AI is in any software and is assisting writers writing and assisting editors to edit and doing proofreading and everything else you're absolutely going to be running into the ethics limits of AIs all over the place. People are already hitting issues with them at even this early stage.