zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. ah765+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-22 08:32:30
According to this tweet thread[1], they negotiated hard for Sam to be off the board and Adam to stay on. That indicates, at least if we're being optimistic, that the current board is not in Sam's pocket (otherwise they wouldn't have bothered)

[1]:(https://twitter.com/emilychangtv/status/1727216818648134101)

replies(2): >>buggle+T >>wouldb+52
2. buggle+T[view] [source] 2023-11-22 08:37:37
>>ah765+(OP)
I’m sorry, but that’s all kayfabe. If there is one thing that’s been demonstrated in this whole fiasco, it’s who really has all the power at OpenAI (and it’s not the board).
3. wouldb+52[view] [source] 2023-11-22 08:46:37
>>ah765+(OP)
Yeah the board is kind of pointless now.

They can't control the CEO, neither fire him.

They can't take actions to take back the back control from Microsoft and Sam because Sam is the CEO. Even if Sam is of the utmost morality, he would be crazy to help them back into a strong position after last week.

So it's the Sam & Microsoft show now, only a master schemer can get back some power to the board.

replies(2): >>wouldb+Fp >>notaha+0q
◧◩
4. wouldb+Fp[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-22 12:10:47
>>wouldb+52
It would be an interesting move to install a co-ceo in a few months. That would be harder to object for Sam
◧◩
5. notaha+0q[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-22 12:13:56
>>wouldb+52
Yeah, that's my take. Doesn't really matter if the composition of the board is to Adam's liking and has a couple more heavy hitters if Sam is untouchable and Microsoft is signalling that any time OpenAI acts against its interests they will take steps to ensure it ceases to have any staff or funding.
[go to top]