zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
4 comments
1. Kepler+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2023-11-22 08:14:46
Pretty sure Apple never aimed to be an Apple.
replies(3):
>>hef198+T
>>sam_lo+q1
>>monosc+Yk
◧
2. hef198+T
[view]
[source]
2023-11-22 08:20:44
>>Kepler+(OP)
They sure sued a lot of apple places over having an apple as logo.
replies(1):
>>_Alger+Mj
◧
3. sam_lo+q1
[view]
[source]
2023-11-22 08:25:42
>>Kepler+(OP)
But The Apple.
◧◩
4. _Alger+Mj
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-11-22 11:03:35
>>hef198+T
If having an apple logo makes a company an apple, then Apple is in fact an apple
◧
5. monosc+Yk
[view]
[source]
2023-11-22 11:14:46
>>Kepler+(OP)
It's actually one of the most spectacular failures in business history, but we don't talk much about it
[go to top]