zlacker

I’m not suggesting that I get to decide or whatever, and I am absolutely happy there is reasoned discussion of cognition.

I do however expect the boards of directors of important companies to avoid publicly supporting obviously regressive ideas such as this gem.

>>alex_y+(OP)
You're happy there is reasoned discussion, but the idea is, in your view, "regressive" whether it's true or not?

>>mvdtnz+c7
True is a bit of a stretch here right?