zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. didip+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-22 07:34:18
Let’s be real here. At the end of the day, what matters more is commercial success and a big payout.

AGI is still very far away and the fear mongering is nothing but PR stunt.

But the devs need their big payout now. Which explains the mutiny.

The “safety” board of directors drank their own koolaid a bit too much.

replies(1): >>mkii+Ri
2. mkii+Ri[view] [source] 2023-11-22 10:08:38
>>didip+(OP)
You can have unsafe AI without AGI.
replies(2): >>Captai+0U >>kuchen+f01
◧◩
3. Captai+0U[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-22 14:24:57
>>mkii+Ri
Of course, it depends on what safety means. Currently it seems to just be a pretext for prudishness and regulation.
◧◩
4. kuchen+f01[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-22 14:51:37
>>mkii+Ri
What will this unsafe AI do?
[go to top]