zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. yosame+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-22 07:20:38
As far as I can tell, Sam did something? to get fired by the board, who are meant to be driven by non-profit ideals instead of corporate profits (probably from Sam pushing profit over safety, but there's no real way to know). From that, basically the whole company threatened to quit and move to Microsoft, showing the board that their power is purely ornamental. To retain any sort of power or say over decision making whatsoever, the board made concessions and got Sam back.

Really it just shows the whole non-profit arm of the company was even more of a lie then it appeared.

replies(1): >>maxdoo+jz
2. maxdoo+jz[view] [source] 2023-11-22 12:14:15
>>yosame+(OP)
Where is this blind trust for the board coming from? The board provided zero rationale for firing Sam.
replies(1): >>evantb+jm1
◧◩
3. evantb+jm1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-22 16:18:55
>>maxdoo+jz
They did give reasons they were just vague. Reading between the lines, it seems the board was implying that Sam was trying to manipulate the board members individually. Was it true? Who knows. And as an outside observer, who cares? This is a fight between rich people about who gets to be richer. AI is so much larger than one cultish startup.
[go to top]