zlacker

That’s certainly some very.. deliberate.. board picks.

Summers, too.

Welp.

>>highwa+(OP)
Say what you want about Summers specifically but I think it's a good idea getting some economists on the board. They are academics but focused on practical, important issues like loss of jobs and what that means for the economy and society. Up until now it seems like the board members have either been AI doomers with no practical experience or Silicon Valley types that inevitably have conflicts of interest, because everybody is starting their own AI venture now.

>>kmlevi+8a
This has nothing to do with Summers being an economist and everything to do with the fact that he used to run the parent agency of the IRS. Summers is the least sensible board pick imaginable unless one takes this fact and the coming regulatory catastrophe into account.

>>thinkc+Vb
>This has nothing to do with Summers being an economist and everything to do with the fact that he used to run the parent agency of the IRS.

It has literally nothing to do with that. The reason he's on the board now is because D'Angelo wanted him on it. You could have a problem with that, but you can't use his inclusion as evidence that the board lost.

>>highwa+(OP)
It seems US Attorneys were calling the Open AI board.

It helps having somebody with government ties on board now.

>>highwa+(OP)
If we achieve AGI it has the potential to capture most (if not all) economic value. Larry Summers was a deliberate choice indeed.