zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. remark+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-22 06:21:59
D'Angelo?

Wonder if this is a signal that the theories about Poe are off the mark.

replies(1): >>adastr+h
2. adastr+h[view] [source] 2023-11-22 06:23:43
>>remark+(OP)
Doesn’t matter. It’s an absolutely clear conflict of interest. It may have taken an unrelated shakeup for people to notice (or maybe D’Angelo was critically involved; we don’t know), but there’s no way he should be staying on this board.
replies(1): >>BillyT+a1
◧◩
3. BillyT+a1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-22 06:30:37
>>adastr+h
maybe it's just going to be easier to fire him in a second step once this current situation which seems to be primarily about ideology is cleared up. In D’Angelo's case it's going to be easier to just point to a clear traditional conflict of interest down the line
[go to top]