zlacker

[parent] [thread] 10 comments
1. Americ+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-22 06:21:18
The website is twitter.com. Why call it something else?
replies(2): >>alex_y+11 >>labste+u1
◧
2. alex_y+11[view] [source] 2023-11-22 06:27:39
>>Americ+(OP)
Also, x.com redirects to Twitter.com. Seems like they want us to say Twitter.
replies(1): >>behnam+U2
◧
3. labste+u1[view] [source] 2023-11-22 06:30:54
>>Americ+(OP)
Exactly right, fellow YCombinator News commenter!
replies(1): >>zarzav+N2
◧◩
4. zarzav+N2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-22 06:38:57
>>labste+u1
I believe you mean Startup News
replies(1): >>tech23+R3
◧◩
5. behnam+U2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-22 06:39:32
>>alex_y+11
saying “to tweet” is definitely better than saying “to xeet”
replies(2): >>asimov+V6 >>wise_y+zj1
◧◩◪
6. tech23+R3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-22 06:45:20
>>zarzav+N2
For reference: https://web.archive.org/web/20070713212949/http://news.ycomb...
replies(1): >>blacko+ya
◧◩◪
7. asimov+V6[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-22 07:04:46
>>behnam+U2
Xeet is super funny, hopefully takes over.
replies(2): >>behnam+b7 >>grumpy+Tc
◧◩◪◨
8. behnam+b7[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-22 07:07:27
>>asimov+V6
share it on Xitter
◧◩◪◨
9. blacko+ya[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-22 07:30:23
>>tech23+R3
From 2nd story on the archive

>It is just a joke that Facebook could be valued at $6 billion.

lol, seems HN is same since forever.

◧◩◪◨
10. grumpy+Tc[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-22 07:48:28
>>asimov+V6
Or xcreet?
◧◩◪
11. wise_y+zj1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-22 15:24:50
>>behnam+U2
Maybe it’s a cross post.
[go to top]