zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. financ+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-20 16:38:47
Everyone always forgets there's two parts to Hanlon's razor:

> Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity (1), but don't rule out malice. (2)

replies(1): >>freedo+vK
2. freedo+vK[view] [source] 2023-11-20 19:24:38
>>financ+(OP)
I don't actually think (2) is part of the razor[1]. If it is, then it doesn't make sense because (1) is an absolute (i.e. "never") which is always evaluated boolean "true", therefore statement (2) is never actually executed and is dead code.

Nevertheless I agree with you and think (2) is wise to always keep in mind. I love Hanlon's Razor but people definitely should take it literally as written and/or as law.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor

[go to top]