zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. unytti+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-20 15:25:42
The nonprofit side of the venture actually was in worse shape before, because it was completely overwhelmed by for-profit operations. A better way to view this is the nonprofit side rebelled, has a much smaller footprint than the for-profit venture, and we're about to see if during the ascendency of the for-profit activities the nonprofit side retained enough rights to continue to be relevant in the AI conversation.

As for employees end masse acting publicly disloyal to their employer, usually not a good career move.

replies(3): >>smegge+m1 >>nordsi+3j >>dumbo-+et
2. smegge+m1[view] [source] 2023-11-20 15:34:58
>>unytti+(OP)
Exsept to many it looks like the board went insane and and started firing on themselves. Anyone fleeing that isnt going to be looked on poorly.
3. nordsi+3j[view] [source] 2023-11-20 17:05:55
>>unytti+(OP)
> As for employees end masse acting publicly disloyal to their employer, usually not a good career move.

Wut?

This is software, not law. The industry is notorious for people jumping ship every couple of years.

replies(1): >>hef198+Qm
◧◩
4. hef198+Qm[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 17:18:08
>>nordsi+3j
Still, doing so publicly still isn't a good idea, IMHO.
5. dumbo-+et[view] [source] 2023-11-20 17:38:39
>>unytti+(OP)
Disloyalty to the board due to overwhelming loyalty to the CEO isn't really an issue. I've interviewed for tech positions where a chat with the CEO is part of the interview process, I've never chatted with the board.
[go to top]