zlacker

From what I heard non-compete clauses are unenforceable in California, so what exactly are they suing for?

I'm pretty sure Satya consulted with an army of lawyers over the weekend regarding the potential issue.

>>mirzap+(OP)
> non-compete clauses are unenforceable in California, so what exactly are they suing for?

Part of suing is to ensure compliance with agreements. There is a lot of IP that Microsoft may not have a license to that these employees have. There are also legitimate questions about conflicts of interests, particularly with a former executive, et cetera.

> pretty sure Satya consulted with an army of lawyers over the weekend regarding the potential issue

Sure. I'm not suggesting anyone did anything illegal. Just that it will be litigated over from every direction.

>>JumpCr+V4
Such as? Unless they are in the habit of downloading multiterraby copies of the trained model and taking.g it home what IP would they have? The training data is the open internet and various licensed archives far to much for them to take and arguably isn't OAI IP anyway. The background is all bases on openly published research much of it released by Google. And Microsoft already has licensed pretty much everything from OAI as part of that multi billion dollar deal.