zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. nkcmr+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-20 14:17:02
A lot of people here seem to be forgetting [Hanlon's Razor](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor)

> Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

replies(2): >>j_cric+ue >>NanoYo+gA
2. j_cric+ue[view] [source] 2023-11-20 15:23:06
>>nkcmr+(OP)
Except for when it's actual malice vOv
replies(1): >>stylep+FV
3. NanoYo+gA[view] [source] 2023-11-20 17:13:22
>>nkcmr+(OP)
You seem to forget that Hanlon's Razor isn't a proven concept, in fact the opposite is more likely to be true, given that pesky thing called recorded history.
replies(1): >>golerg+kR1
◧◩
4. stylep+FV[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 18:25:29
>>j_cric+ue
It could be both. And in many situations malice and stupidity are the same thing.
replies(1): >>j_cric+AP1
◧◩◪
5. j_cric+AP1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 22:04:54
>>stylep+FV
How can {deliberately doing harmful things for a desired harmful outcome} and {doing whatever things with lack of judgment and disregard to consequences at all} be the same thing? In what situations?
◧◩
6. golerg+kR1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 22:15:24
>>NanoYo+gA
Hanlons razor is true because it’s more entertaining, and our simulation runs on stories as they’re cheaper to compute than honest physics.
[go to top]