zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. pearju+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-20 08:30:10
Because OpenAI has first mover advantage, an actual product, the household "ChatGPT" name and starting anything from 0 would mean you start with a 3-0 disadvantage. Even if you threw a few billion dollars at it and attracted all of the top minds for at least a year - probably longer - you will be seen as the "ChatGPT alternative". How long before you can capture the momentum they have now with OpenAI? It's also a legal minefield, even when the majority of employees of OpenAI migrate, there will be all kinds of no-competes and conflicts of interest.

Strategically, this is probably a better move. Microsoft doesn't see their investment implode and they probably have some sort of plan to inject or absorb Sam and/or Microsoft back into OpenAI to prevent this in the future. Perhaps replacing the board of directors to prevent further infighting.

replies(1): >>pknerd+g2
2. pknerd+g2[view] [source] 2023-11-20 08:39:43
>>pearju+(OP)
At the end of the day, it is MSFT that emerged as a winner.
replies(1): >>pearju+n6
◧◩
3. pearju+n6[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 08:58:42
>>pknerd+g2
Yes, when this whole saga is over they will probably absorb the carcass.
[go to top]