zlacker

I really don’t think that’s in the Microsoft DNA to do

>>dagmx+(OP)
This is not Ballmer era. It's Satya.

>>dagmx+(OP)
As I was saying, Satya justt confirmed it: https://twitter.com/satyanadella/status/1726516824597258569

>>mirzap+G2
This is not Melkor era. It's Sauron.

>>dagmx+(OP)
I believe Microsoft R&D has always been a widely respected and culturally “different” org than the rest of the Microsoft org.

>>dagmx+(OP)
Sure but this situation overrrides that. Sam has a lot of bargaining power.

>>mirzap+u4
This was inevitable and the only path forward.

>>38318205

>>38337522

>>38342882

>>mirzap+u4
Saying it and doing it are very different things. Many huge, lumbering companies have a “startup” lab. Few have done anything of note, and typically it’s because the reasons that made the company move slow and not take risks don’t magically disappear because you’re in a different part of the org chart.

>>ctvo+NC
If anything, the examples in that tweet shows the opposite. GitHub and Mojang both done lots of things that wouldn't happen if they weren't now Microsoft, especially GitHub which is only "GitHub" by name at this point, none of the original spirit is still there.

>>ctvo+NC
100% agree

>>ctvo+NC
Microsoft is not just any huge, lumbering company, though. It has probably the best history of research of any pure software company (leaving aside IBM etc): Microsoft Research funded Haskell behind the scenes for years, they had a quantum computing unit in 2006, and already in 2018 were beating the field in AI patents and research:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/louiscolumbus/2019/01/06/micros...

Believing that OpenAI is MSFT's sole move in the AI space would be a serious error.