zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. throwa+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-20 08:06:10
Others from OpenAI team, maybe can lead the AI research, but how does Sam can lead a research group?

IMO, to lead a research group you need some decent research skills, Sam is good at business

replies(4): >>elcome+y1 >>karmas+W1 >>tempes+E2 >>siva7+p3
◧
2. elcome+y1[view] [source] 2023-11-20 08:11:58
>>throwa+(OP)
It will be an applied research group obviously to develop products based on AI
◧
3. karmas+W1[view] [source] 2023-11-20 08:13:22
>>throwa+(OP)
My guess:

This is no research group, this is OpenAI 2.0, Sam/Greg will have enormous autonomy. It will be foolish to think Satya just recruited them to tangle them in MSFT bureaucracy

replies(1): >>SpicyL+64
◧
4. tempes+E2[view] [source] 2023-11-20 08:16:29
>>throwa+(OP)
Sam might be a good product manager.
◧
5. siva7+p3[view] [source] 2023-11-20 08:19:50
>>throwa+(OP)
He did lead together with greg at openai. Not as researchers. For that they hired the initial research team.
◧◩
6. SpicyL+64[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 08:22:04
>>karmas+W1
BigCos generally have a hard time keeping their autonomous groups actually isolated from bureaucracy. Lab126 has been thoroughly corporatized, and Area 120 got outright reabsorbed.
[go to top]