zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. ignora+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-20 06:21:52
Read the paper linked above, and if you don't agree that's okay. There are many who don't.
replies(2): >>maxlin+c1 >>calf+Q2
◧
2. maxlin+c1[view] [source] 2023-11-20 06:30:02
>>ignora+(OP)
Check it again, I think you might have misread the thing. It categorizes things in a way that clearly separates AlphaGO from even shooting towards "AGI". The "General" part of AGI can't really be skipped or words don't make any sense anymore.
replies(1): >>ignora+z1
◧◩
3. ignora+z1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 06:32:40
>>maxlin+c1
Ah, gotcha; I meant "superintelligence" (which is ASI and not AGI).
◧
4. calf+Q2[view] [source] 2023-11-20 06:41:32
>>ignora+(OP)
Has anyone written a response to this paper? Their main gist is to try to define AGI empirically using only what is measurable.
[go to top]