zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. wannac+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-20 05:43:06
Even funnier is someone (in a now flagged and dead'd post) accused me of being a misogynist for daring to even think of questioning her experience or capability as CEO.

If you are CEO for a day do you get to wear a paper crown like at Burger King?

replies(1): >>famous+31
2. famous+31[view] [source] 2023-11-20 05:49:43
>>wannac+(OP)
I don't know if you're misogynist but her qualifications are fine. She's not CEO anymore because she wanted Sam and Greg back not because she somehow failed her 1 day duties.
replies(1): >>sudosy+63
◧◩
3. sudosy+63[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 06:02:38
>>famous+31
I'm not disputing her qualifications but going to war against the board is failing your duties. In a for profit it can work if you have your shareholders on your side but it's clear here that this maneuver can't work.
replies(1): >>famous+A4
◧◩◪
4. famous+A4[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 06:10:15
>>sudosy+63
Needless pedantry. Incompetence isn't the reason she's out is the point anymore than incompetence is the reason Sam is out.
[go to top]