zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. cthalu+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-20 00:33:19
They still exist and put out a product used by quite a few people, so quite well?

You can't judge a non-profit by the same success metrics as a for-profit.

replies(1): >>tsunam+lh
2. tsunam+lh[view] [source] 2023-11-20 02:36:09
>>cthalu+(OP)
They have been a consistent downward spiral into irrelevance. So I’d say … not fine.
replies(1): >>sudosy+4p
◧◩
3. sudosy+4p[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 03:39:43
>>tsunam+lh
They are the last survivor offering an alternative to Blink and seem to be indefinitely sustainable for their core product.

Other companies tried competing against Chrome, and so far Mozilla is the most successful, as everyone else gave up and ship Chrome skins people basically only use by subterfuge or coercion. I'd say that's pretty good.

[go to top]