zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. jstumm+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-19 10:03:42
> While OpenAI leads currently, there are so many competitors that are within striking distance without the drama.

It's hard to put into words, that do not seem contradictory: GPT-4 is barely good enough to provide tremendous value. For what I need, no other model is passing that bar, which makes them not slightly worse but entirely unusable. But again, it's not that GPT-4 is great, and I would most certainly go to whatever is better at the current price metrics in a heartbeat.

replies(1): >>skohan+yx
2. skohan+yx[view] [source] 2023-11-19 14:55:10
>>jstumm+(OP)
What is your use-case? I have not worked with them extensively, but both PALM and LLAMA seem as good as GPT-4 for most tasks I have thrown at them
replies(1): >>barfin+CF3
◧◩
3. barfin+CF3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 09:12:58
>>skohan+yx
I’ve used all 3 a lot. Gpt 4 is definitely better. That being said if I was to rank a close second it would be Claude 2, which I think is really good
replies(1): >>skohan+NK5
◧◩◪
4. skohan+NK5[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-20 19:31:42
>>barfin+CF3
But would you say the others besides GPT-4 are unsuitable? That's the claim I find surprising
[go to top]