zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. hcks+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-19 06:26:36
Once you take in 10 billions then it’s pretty much the opposite, legality is the only things that matter.
replies(3): >>rich_s+O >>TapWat+P4 >>WendyT+K6
2. rich_s+O[view] [source] 2023-11-19 06:36:15
>>hcks+(OP)
Did they take a wire transfer for $10bn in cash, now sitting in their bank account? Or did they get a promise of various funding over N years, subject to milestones, conditions, in a variety of media including cash, Azure credits, loan lines etc.

I'd imagine the latter, and that it can be easily yanked away.

replies(1): >>WendyT+B6
3. TapWat+P4[view] [source] 2023-11-19 07:15:26
>>hcks+(OP)
Depends what you mean. Legally they might be in the clear but guarantee when you fuck around with billions of other people's money, it gets more complicated that that.
◧◩
4. WendyT+B6[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 07:37:18
>>rich_s+O
You mean the latter, but yeah. Financing like that is doled out based on a number of things; it would be wildly irresponsible to do otherwise for reasons exactly like this.
replies(1): >>rich_s+j8
5. WendyT+K6[view] [source] 2023-11-19 07:38:50
>>hcks+(OP)
No, that's not it; relationships play gigantic roles in large deals.

Besides, even if you had an outstanding contract for $10bn, a judge would not pull a "well technically, you did say <X> even though that's absurd, so they get all the money and you get nothing."

◧◩◪
6. rich_s+j8[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 07:54:43
>>WendyT+B6
Fixed, thanks!
[go to top]