zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
7 comments
1. echelo+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2023-11-19 03:15:03
This is the weirdest company equity structure I've ever heard of.
No wonder this is causing drama.
replies(2):
>>satvik+y
>>Keyfra+ld
◧
2. satvik+y
[view]
[source]
2023-11-19 03:21:02
>>echelo+(OP)
Mozilla is somewhat similar, it's a non-profit that owns a for-profit entity.
replies(1):
>>jacque+I5
◧◩
3. jacque+I5
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-11-19 03:55:09
>>satvik+y
And given that FireFox isn't exactly gaining marketshare you can see how well that works for them.
replies(1):
>>desert+o9
◧◩◪
4. desert+o9
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-11-19 04:23:22
>>jacque+I5
A non profit likely doesn’t prioritize growth.
replies(2):
>>echelo+lb
>>jacque+xd
◧◩◪◨
5. echelo+lb
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-11-19 04:40:26
>>desert+o9
At least Mozilla didn't try to abuse congress to achieve regulatory capture.
◧
6. Keyfra+ld
[view]
[source]
2023-11-19 04:55:32
>>echelo+(OP)
And then there's IKEA
replies(1):
>>astran+6i
◧◩◪◨
7. jacque+xd
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-11-19 04:56:17
>>desert+o9
That may be so, but it also probably shouldn't let its flagship fundraising entity wither.
◧◩
8. astran+6i
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-11-19 05:36:35
>>Keyfra+ld
And Novo Nordisk, Rolex, Heineken, Bose, and the NFL.
[go to top]