zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. j45+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-19 02:32:26
Except building something the second time around is often quicker and with the current gains of hardware capabilities and interest in the space… maybe it wouldn’t be a year behind.
replies(2): >>plorg+N8 >>mark_l+jg
2. plorg+N8[view] [source] 2023-11-19 03:31:03
>>j45+(OP)
There are also a ton of ~first mover advantages you can't benefit from, be they of untapped markets for demand or the exploitation of underpriced labor, capital, or IP. If Sam started a new company he would not get as good a deal on hardware or labor, he would get much more scrutiny on his training sets, and he would have to compete against both OpenAI and its competitors.
replies(1): >>j45+tr
3. mark_l+jg[view] [source] 2023-11-19 04:24:05
>>j45+(OP)
I agree. Anthropic and Mistral are good examples. Both companies have key people from OpenAI and they fairly quickly developed good models, but I don’t think either are thinking too hard about real AGI, but instead are trying to create useful and ethical tools.
◧◩
4. j45+tr[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 06:05:05
>>plorg+N8
For sure. Getting ahead and staying ahead is one of them.

I’m just not sure it would be totally starting from scratch since there is more of a playbook and know how.

[go to top]