zlacker

>> A competent board should have asked for legal and professional advice...

I will bite. How do you know they didn't?

>>yathai+(OP)
Typically it would be framed amicably, without so much axe-grinding, particularly for public release. Even ChatGPT itself would have written a more balanced release, and advised against such shenanigans. I enjoy that irony.

>>yathai+(OP)
>house collapses in 15mph wind

Why didn’t they hire a competent builder?

You:

>how do you know they weren’t? It could be pure happenstance! All the nails could… could have been defective! Or something! waves hands

>>newZWh+23
Enron had independent auditors and a law firm approving what they did.

>>yathai+(OP)
That's the thing. Lawyers can give them the letter of the law but might have no idea how popular Sam was inside and outside the company, or how badly he was needed. And that's what really matters here.

>>arbuge+1e
Why does it matters to a board that sticks to the principles of the charter of a non-profit? Why would they look at anything else other than the guiding principles?

>>braiam+EQ
Because their charter says their goal is to get to AGI, or something like that.

If 99% of their employees quit and their investors pull their support because Sam was fired, they're not getting anywhere and have failed to deliver on their charter.