zlacker

That’s not only trivial to replace with enough funding for training, but ChatGPT is barely a 0.1 release. Everything after is where the big money is.

>>joshsp+(OP)
It's not trivial given current supply bottlenecks, not to mention research expertise.

>>joshsp+(OP)
First mover advantage and Microsoft integration is nothing to sneeze at.

>>joshsp+(OP)
trivial to replace

And yet no one has been able to do that since gpt4 was released.

>>p1esk+k1
That's only because the key players have no reason to compete.

They don't want to run a developer/enterprise ChatGPT platform.

Google cares about Search, Apple about Siri, Meta about VR/Ads. But those three are interesting heavily in their own LLMs which at some point may better OpenAI.

>>himara+21
I don't feel like compute for pretraining the model was a huge constraint?

The supply bottlenecks have been around commercializing the ChatGPT product at scale.

But pretraining the underlying model I don't think was on the same order of magnitude, right?

>>himara+21
The control of the supply si with Microsoft, who are likely falling on Sam’s side here.

>>erosen+91
For sure.

But if Altman has a new venture that takes first mover advantage on a whole different playing field MS could easily get left in the dust.