zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. vikram+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-19 00:35:59
Whether or not you agree with the decision they obviously screwed up the execution something awful. This is humiliating for them and honestly setting altman free like they did was probably the permanent end of AI safety. Just take someone with all the connections and the ability to raise billions of dollars overnight and set them free without any of the shackles of AI ethics people in a way that makes all the people with money want to support him? That's how you get skynet
replies(1): >>015a+zE
2. 015a+zE[view] [source] 2023-11-19 05:21:39
>>vikram+(OP)
I tend to think: We, the armchair commentators, do not know what happened internally. I don't know enough to know that the board's execution wasn't the best case scenario to achieve their goal of aligning the entire organization with the non-profit's mission. All I feel comfortable saying with certainty is that: its messy. Anything like this would inevitably be messy.
replies(1): >>vikram+9O
◧◩
3. vikram+9O[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 06:58:30
>>015a+zE
Right and thats what I'm saying. It's messy. They screwed up. Messy is bad. If they needed to get rid of him this last minute and make a statement 30 minutes before market close, then the failure happened earlier.
[go to top]