zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
4 comments
1. Anonym+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2023-11-18 23:58:58
Looking at their CVs, they're more qualified than some rando on the internet. So from my point of view, they look more qualified than you, DebtDeflation, rando from the internet.
replies(2):
>>spacem+L
>>johnfn+d1
◧
2. spacem+L
[view]
[source]
2023-11-19 00:02:11
>>Anonym+(OP)
The GP never claimed to be eligible to serve on the board, so the attack is unwarranted.
replies(1):
>>Anonym+p1
◧
3. johnfn+d1
[view]
[source]
2023-11-19 00:04:15
>>Anonym+(OP)
I don’t need to be an Olympian to know that my kid isn’t ready yet.
replies(1):
>>fnfjfk+Z5
◧◩
4. Anonym+p1
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-11-19 00:05:04
>>spacem+L
It's perfectly warranted to call someone out on a claim that board members wouldn't qualify for a kid's lemonade stand.
◧◩
5. fnfjfk+Z5
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-11-19 00:30:54
>>johnfn+d1
An even better example, as someone that also could not do a trick in a half pipe:
https://deadspin.com/the-winter-olympics-feature-2-951-of-th...
[go to top]