zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. gkober+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 23:44:20
I genuinely believe Worldcoin/World ID is terrible for optics and is not something Sam should have put his name on.

That being said, here's my strongman argument: Sam is scared of the ramifications of AI, especially financially. He's experimenting with a lot of things, such as Basic Income (https://www.ycombinator.com/blog/basic-income), rethinking capitalism (https://moores.samaltman.com/) and Worldcoin.

He's also likely worried about what happens if you can't tell who is human and who isn't. We will certainly need a system at some point for verifying humanity.

Worldcoin doesn't store iris information; it just stores a hash for verification. It's an attempt to make sure everyone gets one, and to keep things fair and more evenly distributed.

(Will it work? I don't think so. But to call it an eyeball identity scam and dismiss Sam out of hand is wrong)

replies(1): >>felixg+v4
2. felixg+v4[view] [source] 2023-11-19 00:05:32
>>gkober+(OP)
Sam Altman is 'rethinking capitalism' in the same way a jackal rethinks and disrupts sheep flocks. Are we thinking about the same guy? I'm thinking of this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhhId_WG7RA
replies(1): >>gkober+K7
◧◩
3. gkober+K7[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 00:22:22
>>felixg+v4
I don't get your point. He's a capitalist, no doubt, but he also knows the rules will change rapidly if we ever achieve AGI.
replies(1): >>felixg+Ad
◧◩◪
4. felixg+Ad[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 01:00:22
>>gkober+K7
the rules would definitely change. Would you want a popped collar fail-upwards guy who creates a crypto scam to be part of the rule making structure, or would you prefer that not to be the case?
[go to top]