zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. norir+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 21:43:28
> It's an extremely IP sensitive industry

I know this will not resonate with some, but on some level I do not really subscribe to the idea of intellectual property. My personal belief is that the brain is more like a radio receiver. The ideas are floating out there for anyone to pull down. The more sensitive among us are able better able to hear what is there and report it back to the rest of us. To claim ownership of an idea is to me like claiming ownership of the note A or the pythagorean theorem. Of course there should be some rewards for introducing novel ideas to the world but to me the real reward is the creative experience of bringing something into the world that was previously unknown.

In an ideal world, I do not think that hedge funds (or most fintech) would even exist. It sort of offends me that we would waste our civic resources legally enforcing ip rights. But I also understand that my position is far from universal.

replies(2): >>Cohere+J2 >>bumby+E7
2. Cohere+J2[view] [source] 2023-11-18 22:01:05
>>norir+(OP)
I think your viewpoint is great and poetic. However, since most people are not as mature as you, our societies are not as mature as you. Meaning that until this fact changes, I do not think it is realist to expect someone to give something for free when they could make billions with it.

You have to be a saint or already have everything you could ever dream of

replies(1): >>shorts+LV3
3. bumby+E7[view] [source] 2023-11-18 22:29:02
>>norir+(OP)
This is an idealized notion (but one I wish everyone could adhere to). In reality, intellectual property rights were considered a necessity for societal progress. Before intellectual property rights, many ideas were lost because they were guarded too tightly. If that person died, those secrets were potentially lost forever and, presumably, society would be worse for it. So we developed IP rights as a way to share ideas in exchange for exclusive rights to them for some time. (This isn't discounting how these laws can be perverted to hurt the original intent).

Likewise, trade secrets are a mechanism to help foster better (and fairer) commercial practices under the guise that society will benefit. It's a pragmatic take rather than an idealistic one.

◧◩
4. shorts+LV3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 23:48:49
>>Cohere+J2
The only way the someone can make 'billions' is because of the state-given and enforced monopoly on production. Without this required threat of state violence, your ideas start being worth much less in the actually competitive markets.
[go to top]