zlacker

[parent] [thread] 0 comments
1. chubot+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 17:58:43
Well that's always been the rub ... It's a non-profit AND a for-profit company (controlled by a non-profit)

It's also extremely intertwined with and competes with for-profit companies

Financially it's wholly dependent on Microsoft, one of the biggest for-profit companies in the world

Many of the employees are recruited from for-profit companies (e.g. Google), though certainly many come from academic institutions too.

So the whole thing is very messy, kind of "born in conflict" (similar to Twitter's history -- a history of conflicts between CEOs).

It sounds like this is a continuation of the conflict that led to Anthropic a few years ago.

[go to top]