zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. taway1+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 17:09:03
I want you to be right. But why do you think you're more qualified to say how to make AI safe than the board of a world-leading AI nonprofit?
replies(3): >>ignora+a9 >>ethanb+aF >>qualif+h74
◧
2. ignora+a9[view] [source] 2023-11-18 17:56:53
>>taway1+(OP)
Someone is going to be right, but we also know that experts have known to be wrong in the past, ofttimes to a catastrophic effect.
◧
3. ethanb+aF[view] [source] 2023-11-18 20:54:07
>>taway1+(OP)
Literal wishful thinking ("powerful technology is always good") and vested interests ("I like building on top of this powerful technology"), same as always.
◧
4. qualif+h74[view] [source] 2023-11-19 20:35:42
>>taway1+(OP)
Because I work on AI alignment myself and had been training LLMs long before Attention is All You Need came out (which cites some of my work).
[go to top]