zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. dudul+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 13:48:00
Sounds like a terrible compromise to me.

Why do I need to spend 6 months without pay and then more time with only 50%?

replies(1): >>qwerty+lH2
2. qwerty+lH2[view] [source] 2023-11-19 06:56:08
>>dudul+(OP)
Because I would never want to jump straight into a new job anyway, a good sabbatical seems a great idea if you can afford it (leaving an engineering/management job suggests you probably can). Being totally free from a job and still getting 50% of the salary for free also sounds like a dream - just move to a cheaper place and enjoy the life.
replies(1): >>dudul+Xx3
◧◩
3. dudul+Xx3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 14:56:17
>>qwerty+lH2
But that's not what you described. You talked about a 6 months non compete, and then potentially longer in exchange for 50% salary.

Not everybody wants/can move to a cheaper place.

Finally, as mentioned in any messages here, engineers are not the ones suffering the most from unfair non-compete. It's retail/restauration workers and more "vulnerable" demographics.

Your "compromise" comes out as completely disconnected from reality.

[go to top]