zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. LightM+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 12:54:27
Even if they could, why would Sam accept it? The smartest move for Sam is to just start his own for-profit company, easily raise a fuckton of money, hire all the talents from OpenAI and carry on with whatever he was doing. I think this is OpenAI's loss more than anything else. Now if the reason is truly a push against Sam's for-profit direction, I wonder if OpenAI will back it up by releasing their models to the public again. That would be world-changing, specially if the successor to GPT-4 is already trained.
replies(2): >>toomuc+g >>sanp+k6
2. toomuc+g[view] [source] 2023-11-18 12:57:23
>>LightM+(OP)
It’s a fair point, and I suppose the question is the math around the equity potential of a new org built from scratch vs being issued a boatload of Microsoft equity, the future profit potential from that grant, while being able to walk right in to a fully operationalized env.
3. sanp+k6[view] [source] 2023-11-18 13:33:32
>>LightM+(OP)
Sam and the board have realized the existing structure of OpenAI does not make them (Sam, board, investors) as wealthy as a for-profit structure would. This is the start of winding down OpenAI. I will not be surprised at all if Sam does what you have said and some members of the existing board invest.
[go to top]