It is the reason why CEOs (not Sam, apparently) are usually compensated in stock options. Golden parachutes are some sort of severance when the CEO gets fired immediately from the new company, eg. Twitter.
He's totally the guy who made OpenAI into ClosedAI, but money was clearly not his motivation.
If money was his motivation, why wouldn't he spend his time building a company like that in the first place? As the head of YC, I don't think he would've had any trouble raising for anything, even prior to OpenAI.
Also, it's not really parent's "point" as you claim; they quite explicitly talk about compensation in case of acquisition.
A similar (but even more complicated) case is currently going on over at Sculptor Capital Management, where former management is suing current management because they have chosen to go with a "worse" acquisition deal that would let current management stay on-board. This is despite shareholder approval to the "worse" deal. https://www.pionline.com/hedge-funds/ex-sculptor-executives-...
In fact, to prevent this situation is exactly why golden parachutes exist.
It's also totally unproportional compared to what Sam would've gotten if he owned equity.
Yes, it’s a strategy that would/did require—among other chancey things—Altman to make a big bet on himself rather than OpenAI on him.