zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. stuaxo+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 11:13:26
LLMs are not any kind of intelligence, but it can work to augment intelligence.
replies(3): >>darker+j6 >>cjonas+fM >>skohan+9Z
2. darker+j6[view] [source] 2023-11-18 11:59:49
>>stuaxo+(OP)
How smart would any human be without training and source material?
replies(2): >>knicho+nl >>Jensso+2N
◧◩
3. knicho+nl[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 13:37:07
>>darker+j6
I think the boy of Aveyron answers that question pretty well.
replies(1): >>darker+hw1
4. cjonas+fM[view] [source] 2023-11-18 16:16:23
>>stuaxo+(OP)
So in other words... Artificial intelligence?

LLM are surprisingly effective as general AI. Tasks that used to require a full on ML team are now accessible with 10 minutes of "prompting".

◧◩
5. Jensso+2N[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 16:20:29
>>darker+j6
Smart enough to make weapons, tame dogs, start fires and cultivate plants. Humans managed to do that even when most of their time was spent gathering food or starving.
replies(1): >>darker+Dw1
6. skohan+9Z[view] [source] 2023-11-18 17:23:22
>>stuaxo+(OP)
Do you think we know enough about what intelligence is to rule out whether LLM's might be a form of it?
◧◩◪
7. darker+hw1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 20:22:23
>>knicho+nl
Thanks for the reference. My takeaway from reading up on him is, not very smart at all.
◧◩◪
8. darker+Dw1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 20:25:03
>>Jensso+2N
Nobody cares about making an AI with basic human survival skills. We could probably have a certified genius level AI that still couldn't do any of that because it lacks a meaningful physical body.

If we wanted to make that the goal instead of actual meaningful contributions to human society, we could probably achieve it, and it would be a big waste of time imo.

[go to top]