zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. worlds+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 08:55:02
Does it really have that kind of self awareness to be able to do that successfully? I feel very sceptical.
replies(2): >>Roark6+R2 >>irthom+mg
2. Roark6+R2[view] [source] 2023-11-18 09:17:48
>>worlds+(OP)
I doubt self awareness has anything to do with it..
replies(1): >>worlds+ki
3. irthom+mg[view] [source] 2023-11-18 11:14:28
>>worlds+(OP)
Just have it write 10 and bench them against your own.
◧◩
4. worlds+ki[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 11:27:31
>>Roark6+R2
What else would you call the ability for it to adapt a task for its own capabilities?
replies(1): >>mkl+Ht
◧◩◪
5. mkl+Ht[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 12:49:24
>>worlds+ki
Language modelling, token prediction. It's not much different from generating code in a particular programming language; given examples, learn the patterns and repeat them. There's no self-awareness or consciousness or understanding or even the concept of capabilities, just predicting text.
replies(1): >>worlds+Abe
◧◩◪◨
6. worlds+Abe[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-21 22:50:53
>>mkl+Ht
Sure but that kind of sounds like it is building a theory of mind of itself.

If it does have considerable training data including prompt and response when people are interacting with itself then I suppose it isn't that surprising.

That does sound like self awareness, in the non magical sense. It is aware of its own behaviour because it has been trained on it.

[go to top]