zlacker

[parent] [thread] 8 comments
1. Mentlo+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 08:12:41
Chat gpt is not a good source of truth so can’t be used for information retrieval at scale. You might have a specific usage pattern that is very different to the majority of Google Search users so it works for you
replies(4): >>crypto+a1 >>Racing+W1 >>taberi+x3 >>hilux+Y5
2. crypto+a1[view] [source] 2023-11-18 08:23:36
>>Mentlo+(OP)
Searching Google is not a good source of truth either; especially their infoboxes which have been infamously and dangerously wrong. And if you follow a random search result link - well, who knows if the content on that site is trustworthy either!
replies(1): >>Mentlo+r2
3. Racing+W1[view] [source] 2023-11-18 08:30:46
>>Mentlo+(OP)
the ad ridden shitware website filled with seo buzzwords with 100% opacity keywords also isn't a good source of truth. i'll take chatgpt over that.
replies(1): >>Mentlo+f2
◧◩
4. Mentlo+f2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 08:33:19
>>Racing+W1
Sure, use a different search engine then.

To each their own.

◧◩
5. Mentlo+r2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 08:34:48
>>crypto+a1
But you’re in control of your information retrieval, you didn’t have an unreliable agent synthesise bits in the middle.

Again - to each their own. But what people use google for GPT doesn’t replicate anyway (and what the Google business was built on) - which is commercial info retrieval.

replies(1): >>hilux+ls1
6. taberi+x3[view] [source] 2023-11-18 08:45:43
>>Mentlo+(OP)
Personally, I don't have use case for comparing Google and ChatGPT that has truth as a requirement in the output.

For the majority of my use of ChatGPT and Google, I need to be able to get useful answers to vague questions - answers that I can confirm for myself through other means - and I need to iterate on those questions to hone in on the problem at hand. ChatGPT is undoubtedly superior to Google in that regard.

replies(1): >>Mentlo+b7
7. hilux+Y5[view] [source] 2023-11-18 09:05:31
>>Mentlo+(OP)
Google is not a good source of truth at all, for anything other than hard facts. And nowadays, even the concept of "hard fact" is getting a bit fuzzy.

Google search reminds me of Amazon reviews. Years ago, basically trustworthy, very helpful. Now ... take them with a tablespoon of salt and another of MSG.

And this is separate from the time-efficiency issue: "how quickly can I answer my complex question which requires several logical joins?", which is where ChatGPT really shines.

◧◩
8. Mentlo+b7[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 09:16:22
>>taberi+x3
Agreed, but this will probably be limited to domains where there’s better products
◧◩◪
9. hilux+ls1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 18:06:45
>>Mentlo+r2
As of a recent update, ChatGPT can do an internet search to answer "find a Thai restaurant near me." Of course, it uses Bing, not Google.

And for my single query above, ChatGPT searched multiple sources, aggregated the results, and offered a summary and recommendations, which is a lot more than Google would have done.

ChatGPT's major current limitation is that it just refuses to answer certain questions [what is the email address for person.name?] or gets very woke with some other answers.

[go to top]