Jakub Pachocki, director of research; Aleksander Madry, head of AI risk team, and Szymon Sidor.
Scoop: theinformation.com
Paywalled link: https://www.theinformation.com/articles/three-senior-openai-...
Submitting information since paywalled links are not permitted.
https://www.semanticscholar.org/author/J.-Pachocki/2713380?s...
As @eachro pointed out, Aleksander Madry is on leave from his MIT professorship. His publications:
So here's my theory which might sound crazy. Sam planned to open a new AI company and taking away openAI's top talents to his company. And breaking up openAI into non profit and his for profit company.
Sam's first tweet after all this has, just hours after this article:
> will have more to say about what’s next later.
So either he knew that he was about to be fired or at least was prepared.
Also based on the wording of the press release, Sam did something that the board absolutely hated. Because most of the time even if he did something illegal it doesn't make sense to risk defamation by accusing him publically. Also based on his video of yesterday at the APEC summit, he repeated the similar lines few times:
> I am super excited. I can't imagine anything more exciting to work on.
So here if we assume he knew he was about to get fired, the conclusion is clear.
https://time.com/collection/time100-ai/6309033/greg-brockman...
https://chat.openai.com/share/c35e3fd1-d94e-477b-a331-b14384...
edits: >>38314420
I imagine when the full story comes out all these theories and speculations will be ignored and we will literally forget ever being interested in them!
Maybe Ilya discovered something as head of AI safety research, something bad, and they had to act on it. From the outside it looks as if they are desperately trying to gain control. Maybe he got confirmation that LLMs are a little bit conscious, LOL. No, I am not making this up: https://twitter.com/ilyasut/status/1491554478243258368
As a part of this transition, Greg Brockman will be stepping down as chairman
of the board and will remain in his role at the company, reporting to the CEO.
[1] https://openai.com/blog/openai-announces-leadership-transiti...https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embrace,_extend,_and_extinguis...
Literally people thought they were saints because of VSCode FFS.
(it's about just one letter - a vs ą)
If that's the way he wants to be known, it's up to him.
Microsoft doesn't even own a majority stake in the for-profit, much less anything at all in the non-profit that ultimately controls everything.
Microsoft has a minority stake in the for-profit subsidiary that is wholly controlled by the 501(c)(3). All investors (and employees) in the for-profit have to agree to the operating agreement that specifies the for-profit is not actually obligated to actually make a profit and that it is all secondary the charter the non-profit operates under.
https://openai.com/our-structure https://openai.com/charter
There is not a higher power than the board of the non-profit.
First sentence on https://openai.com/about
See: >>38312704
> Once you have their money, you never give it back.
There is no official rule 2 so the non-cannon one is as good as any and the unwritten rule [2]:
> When no appropriate rule applies, make one up
Means they probably would have been covered either way.
[0] https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Rules_of_Acquisition#Ap...
[1] https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Rules_of_Acquisition#Of...
[2] https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Rules_of_Acquisition#Un...
A similar (but even more complicated) case is currently going on over at Sculptor Capital Management, where former management is suing current management because they have chosen to go with a "worse" acquisition deal that would let current management stay on-board. This is despite shareholder approval to the "worse" deal. https://www.pionline.com/hedge-funds/ex-sculptor-executives-...
In fact, to prevent this situation is exactly why golden parachutes exist.
It's also totally unproportional compared to what Sam would've gotten if he owned equity.
They are? Here's my submission of your link.
Maybe @dang can put it under your name?
https://innovationorigins.com/en/openai-and-googles-bard-acc...
And those which are carried in our pockets are no longer capable of being home brewed.
Lol try giving it any of the puzzles from here: https://momath.org/home/varsity-math/complete-varsity-math/
Don’t just accept its confident tone, read through and actually parse the logic. It totally falls apart.
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/04/21/why-apple-co-founder-steve-w...
My take: He’s the Keanu Reeves of tech (or Keanu is the Woz of the film industry). The world can use more of this.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-11-19/openai-ne...
OpenAI Negotiations to Reinstate Altman Hit Snag Over Board Role
OpenAI’s leaders want board removed, but directors resisting
Microsoft’s Nadella leading high-stakes talks on Altman return
Sam AltmanPhotographer: Joel Saget/AFP/Getty Images Have a confidential tip for our reporters? Get in Touch Before it’s here, it’s on the Bloomberg Terminal LEARN MORE By Emily Chang, Edward Ludlow, Rachel Metz, and Dina Bass November 20, 2023 at 7:17 AM GMT+11 Updated on November 20, 2023 at 7:47 AM GMT+11
A group of OpenAI executives and investors racing to get Sam Altman reinstated to his role as chief executive officer have reached an impasse over the makeup and role of the board, according to people familiar with the negotiations. The decision to restore Altman’s role as CEO could come quickly, though talks are fluid and still ongoing.
At midday Sunday, Altman and former President Greg Brockman were in the startup’s headquarters, according to people familiar with the matter.
OpenAI leaders pushing for the board to resign and to reinstate Altman include Interim CEO Mira Murati, Chief Strategy Officer Jason Kwon and Chief Operating Officer Brad Lightcap, according to a person with knowledge of the discussions. foundering_tout
Altman, who was fired Friday, is open to returning but wants to see governance changes — including the removal of existing board members, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the negotiations are private. After facing intense pressure following their decision to fire Altman Friday, the board agreed in principle to step down, but have so far refused to officially do so. The directors have been vetting candidates for new directors.
At the center of the high-stakes negotiations between the executives, investors and the board is Microsoft Corp. CEO Satya Nadella. Nadella has been leading the charge on talks between the different factions, some of the people said. Microsoft is OpenAI’s biggest investor, with $13 billion invested in the company.