zlacker

>>convex+(OP)
So what was he lying about that got the board so pissed? A story that fits is that they assumed/knew that he had different goals and/or was going to create a spinoff.

If they waited for the GPT5 pretraining to finish and then they minimized the cost of the loss of Altman and the engineers.

The whole secrecy, compartmentalization and urgency of their actions could only be explained by being against a wall. Otherwise if it was about ethics, future plans or whatever political it would happen at a slower pace.

Hope they involved their investors beforehand but I don't know if they had time, OpenAI probably still exists and evolves on other people's money. But what else could they do?

>>antman+kd
current popular theory is that those fired/left were taking OpenAI for profit, and the board stuck with their original goal of non profit.

>>thinki+hg
you mean current completely made up speculation by anon online?

>>Lacerd+4h
That's one source. There are others about, but as I wrote it's a "theory".

edits: >>38314420

I imagine when the full story comes out all these theories and speculations will be ignored and we will literally forget ever being interested in them!