zlacker

> Ousting sama and gdb over something as petty as a simple strategy disagreement

A fundamental inability to align on what, on a fundamental level, the mission set out in the charter of a 501(c)(3) charity means in real world terms is not "a simple strategy disagreement"; moreover, the existence of a factional dispute over that doesn't mean that there weren't serious specific conduct that occurred in the context of that dispute over goals.

>>dragon+(OP)
The board questioned his “candid”-ness. This was not a difference of opinion on strategy.

>>Sai_+r8
Unless the board perceived his actions to be more in line with a different strategy than communicated.

>>tremon+YI
Yes, but the “candid” part carries the additional implication that he lied to make them think that.

>>Sai_+r8
Candidness is a behavior question, the stories about what has been summarized as a difference of strategy (which, IMO, underestimates the fundamental difference that is described) seem to be providing a context for what ia described as long-running internal tension that ultimately led to the firing, not whatever behavior may have been the proximate cause.