zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. kmlevi+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 06:20:16
Right but if the true issue was with a major and unambiguously bad transgression by Sam and Sam alone (e.g., there was a major leak of data and he lied about it, etc), why would they go after his ally as well? It makes the whole thing look more political rather than a principled “we had no choice“ reaction to a wrongdoing.
replies(1): >>jlpom+Ec
â—§
2. jlpom+Ec[view] [source] 2023-11-18 08:22:32
>>kmlevi+(OP)
It's possible that he may have defended him enough that the board did no longer entrust him to remain on it.
[go to top]