Truth is subjective and if there is anything that could suggest other motive, as I said earlier, it would be open to interpretation by a jury.
Really they should have just said something to the effect of, "The board has voted to end Sam Altman's tenure as CEO at OpenAI. We wish him the best in his future endeavors."
>>lenerd+(OP)
Meh, they don't need to prove that much. It would be Altman that had to prove a lot, because the law favors defendant in this situation. To protect the speech, actually.