zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. vanjaj+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 03:52:08
are you suggesting they brought up a vote on a whim at a board meeting and acted on it same day
replies(1): >>fsckbo+K1
2. fsckbo+K1[view] [source] 2023-11-18 04:06:00
>>vanjaj+(OP)
no, I was replying to a comment that said it was a power struggle in which the board needed to act quickly before they lost power.

The board may very well have met for this very reason, or perhaps it was at this meeting that the lack of candor was found or discussed, but to hold a board meeting there is overhead, and if the board is already in agreement at the meeting, they vote.

It only seems sudden to outsiders, and that suddenness does not mean a "night of the long knives".

replies(1): >>lazide+2g
◧◩
3. lazide+2g[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 05:49:10
>>fsckbo+K1
How would the board have lost power?
replies(1): >>fsckbo+TB
◧◩◪
4. fsckbo+TB[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 09:10:24
>>lazide+2g
that's what i'm saying, it was not a power struggle. I shouldn't have to make the other guy's argument for him...
[go to top]