zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. holler+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 03:49:57
That must be it because obviously no knowledgeable person could honestly come to believe that the technology is dangerous.
replies(1): >>wmf+N2
2. wmf+N2[view] [source] 2023-11-18 04:12:06
>>holler+(OP)
I think he's telling the truth about his beliefs. But if he always believed that AI is dangerous they should have never done the Microsoft deal.
replies(1): >>aamoyg+aQ1
◧◩
3. aamoyg+aQ1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 17:27:18
>>wmf+N2
Taking the Microsoft deal was incredibly smart. Microsoft acts as their shield and commercializes their technology (so that they do not need to worry about it) and in turn gives them nigh unlimited resources to innovate. Microsoft builds the products it wants, and OpenAI gets to innovate. This sort of investment for wealth generation is pretty close to ideal capitalism where people do not care about short term profit. I wouldn't be surprised if Satya Nadella orchestrated this, because it's OpenAI's role to innovate responsibly and Microsoft's job to sell to essentially fund their innovation. So wtf is Altman for?
[go to top]