zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. Americ+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 01:28:58
So I should cancel any plans to build on the GPT platform? Because it doesn't align with the values of Ilya and Helen?

Open AI- we need clarity on your new direction.

replies(2): >>jay_ky+t1 >>bitcha+vX
2. jay_ky+t1[view] [source] 2023-11-18 01:38:55
>>Americ+(OP)
Do you really want to build a business on a platform with 100% lock in.

It not like to can just move to another AI company if you don't like their terms.

replies(1): >>Retpol+d5
◧◩
3. Retpol+d5[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 02:00:44
>>jay_ky+t1
My Open AI bill was (opens dashboard...), $43,xxx last month.

First thing tomorrow I'm kicking off another round of searching for alternatives.

replies(1): >>7thacc+ox
◧◩◪
4. 7thacc+ox[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 05:32:00
>>Retpol+d5
Just out of curiosity, what are you using it for that makes it that valuable?
replies(2): >>nurett+CE >>Retpol+mN3
◧◩◪◨
5. nurett+CE[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 06:32:22
>>7thacc+ox
It's probably the gpt cost of a metered product.
6. bitcha+vX[view] [source] 2023-11-18 09:28:37
>>Americ+(OP)
I think you're confused. If Altman was allowed to continue you'd end up in a vendor lock-in situation with that guy endlessly bumping the fees.
◧◩◪◨
7. Retpol+mN3[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-19 03:06:50
>>7thacc+ox
I have basically shipped gpt-4-32k to a few million boomers. Hard to say more without doxxing myself.
replies(1): >>razoda+Pxf
◧◩◪◨⬒
8. razoda+Pxf[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-22 01:34:46
>>Retpol+mN3
I understand the meaning of this statement but please reconsider the way you view your customer base - it's not a good grounding for the success of your business to think this way. Great work with what you've built so far!
[go to top]