zlacker

[parent] [thread] 8 comments
1. abigai+(OP)[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:56:59
Illegal to restructure a business?
replies(3): >>OkayPh+i1 >>AYBABT+I1 >>speedy+e3
2. OkayPh+i1[view] [source] 2023-11-18 01:04:37
>>abigai+(OP)
To restructure a non-profit, that solicited donations, into a for-profit entity? Abso-fucking-lutely.
replies(1): >>sbierw+C1
◧◩
3. sbierw+C1[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 01:06:24
>>OkayPh+i1
Easy enough to return the donations.
replies(2): >>userna+j2 >>arthur+Gv
4. AYBABT+I1[view] [source] 2023-11-18 01:07:03
>>abigai+(OP)
It's not just "restructuring" a business that's a 501(c)3... to make it a golden goose for MSFT. The whole thing was created to avoid one of Big Tech having a monopoly on AI, and it turns into Big Tech having a monopoly.

Perhaps it's all legal but I think it's very understandable to look at it and think it's a travesty.

replies(1): >>pfannk+rk
◧◩◪
5. userna+j2[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 01:09:24
>>sbierw+C1
Is this sarcasm?
replies(1): >>EchoRe+EA
6. speedy+e3[view] [source] 2023-11-18 01:14:54
>>abigai+(OP)
I imagine you’d have to either pay back all of the people who donated to the non-profit first, or negotiate a deal with for a stake in the company before you can transform it into a for profit.
◧◩
7. pfannk+rk[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 03:16:35
>>AYBABT+I1
I thought it was created to prevent specifically Google from having a monopoly on AI. So mission accomplished?
◧◩◪
8. arthur+Gv[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 04:40:51
>>sbierw+C1
Money is spent
◧◩◪◨
9. EchoRe+EA[view] [source] [discussion] 2023-11-18 05:15:27
>>userna+j2
pretty sure not sarcasm
[go to top]