zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
2 comments
1. dekhn+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2023-11-18 00:29:44
Since he was chair of the board... I'm curious how the rest of the board implemented this.
replies(1):
>>Widder+N1
◧
2. Widder+N1
[view]
[source]
2023-11-18 00:37:16
>>dekhn+(OP)
In the board I served on in the past we had an agreed quorum where we could make binding decisions if ~2/3rds of the members were present.
Probably a similar situation.
replies(1):
>>cyanyd+76
◧◩
3. cyanyd+76
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2023-11-18 01:00:00
>>Widder+N1
which makes sense because it'd take 2/3 to implement something if they're unanimous.
just base logic.
[go to top]